Assessment and requirements. Applications will thereafter be used in Peer Review to be able to assess the content that is scientific of task and rank the proposals
Quicklinks
The Peer Review Panel
Access is awarded based on clinical quality for the proposals which is evaluated and assessed by a panel of worldwide specialists (Peer Review Panel – PRP), recognised with regards to their expertise in the area of conservation and scientific tests of Cultural Heritage.
The PRP is a board separate from the IPERION CH partners, and it’s also composed by:
A. G. Karydas – A. Heritage – A. Lluveras – A. Denker – A. Balzeau – C. Pacheco – E. Godfrey – G. Eggert – G. Verri – H.E. Mahnke – J. Dani – J. Raisanen – K.T. Biró – K. Van Balen – L. Robbiola – P. Noble – P. Ropret – S. Greiff – S. Zucchiatti
ARCHLAB – Evaluation process and requirements
Following the proposals are submitted, the ARCHLAB Program Coordinator and also the ARCHLAB greeting Desk, will confirm the compliance that is formal the EU laws, undertaking a prioritizing for the applications according to available expertise, ongoing possible collaboration jobs, available time etc. verifying as well the relevance/feasibility of usage of the ARCHLAB facility. Applications will thereafter be used in Peer Review so that you can measure the systematic content associated with the task and rank the proposals. The decision that is final be reported to your ARCHLAB Coordinator who can inform the applicant while the access provider of this Peer Review conclusions. Each access provider can certainly make a decision that is final the level of access supplied into the consumer Group (range times, amount of the visit, provider interior rules, IPR dilemmas, etc.).